A controversial plan to expand a pub near Blackfriars Bridge has been thrown out by Southwark Council, after complaints from locals who were concerned about the extra noise costing them sleep, and losing their views of the Thames.
Council plans said a proposal to expand the capacity of the Founder’s Arms to by an extra 100 people ran the risk of creating “harmful noise impacts” and “anti social behaviour” that would affect people living in the nearby Falcon Point flats.
Young’s, which runs the pub, said in a statement that it had consulted extensively with locals and was “disappointed” with the decision. The company added that it was reviewing the decision – potentially leaving the door open for an appeal.
Young’s said in its planning application to add an extra bar and dining area that the extension would create 22 jobs at the peak of summer business. The company also pointed out that pubs have been hit hard in the Covid-19 and investment like this scheme is key for the sector.
Locals who had objected to the plan said they were “relieved and grateful” following the decision.
John Baldock, a resident of Falcon Point, added: “We are very glad that Southwark Council has refused further expansion. The Founders Arms is open until midnight at weekends and Falcon Point residents are currently suffering considerable noise from late-night drinkers around the pub until well into the small hours.
Liz Loughran, a town planner who advised Falcon Point residents on the case, said the decision could prove influential in further cases that pit developers against people living locally.
“The decision shows how Councils can protect the amenity and health of the local population against potential harm from new development,” she said in an email. “Across London and the UK a new method of assessment to protect the amenity of neighbours has been enshrined in national planning policy.
“This policy has come from the World Health Organisation. It addresses the effect of noise and disruption and the risk of harm to health arising from disruption to sleep or psychological stress caused by operational activities of developers.”
“The onus is now on a developer to show how it can mitigate such risk and if it cannot, planning permission should be refused by Councils.
A spokesperson for Young’s said: “After extensive consultation with planning officers and the local community, Young’s is disappointed that the council has refused our plans to sensitively extend and improve the Founder’s Arms.